In the intricate tapestry of Sudan’s recent history, many a discerning voice emerged early on, challenging prevailing narratives surrounding the attempted coup orchestrated by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) against General Barhan. These voices, whose prescient analyses pointed to the involvement of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia, now stand vindicated as recent events unfold.
From the onset, it was suggested that a deeper entanglement of the UAE and Saudi Arabia in the Sudanese conflict, positing that the RSF, with its close ties to the Emiratis, was executing a larger geopolitical agenda. The subsequent failure of peace negotiations, ostensibly mediated by Saudi Arabia, served to underscore the flawed strategy of sidelining General Barhan in favor of legitimizing the RSF, a miscalculation that has spiraled into further unrest.
Though met with skepticism initially, recent developments have unequivocally validated the initial claims. The undeniable role of the RSF as a militia for the Emiratis and the less overt involvement of Saudi Arabia in attempting to marginalize General Barhan have become glaringly apparent. The breakdown of talks has only deepened the crisis, laying bare the misguided tactics employed by these regional powers.
From a moral standpoint, the right course of action for the UAE would be to sever ties with the RSF, realign with General Barhan, and actively support the restoration of civilian democratic rule in Sudan. However, a lingering skepticism prevails, as the UAE appears entrenched in a misguided belief that any failure would jeopardize its regional credibility. This stance, aside from being politically unwise, is deeply immoral.
The UAE and Saudi Arabia, acknowledged for their success in expanding influence through soft power, find themselves entangled in a web of violence and chaos in Sudan. The way forward demands a recalibration of their strategy, with a renewed focus on constructive avenues such as investment, financial aid, and programs that genuinely benefit the Sudanese people.
Recognizing the urgency of the situation, these nations must act swiftly to end the conflict before Sudan becomes a casualty of a broader proxy war. Sudan, a brotherly nation, deserves more than to be torn apart by the geopolitical ambitions of external powers.
The UAE and Saudi Arabia must reassess their approach, disavow violence, and actively pursue diplomatic solutions that prioritize the welfare of the Sudanese people. Only through sincere efforts to rectify the damage caused can these nations hope to regain the trust and respect of their brotherly nation, Sudan. The path to redemption lies in embracing diplomacy over power politics and committing to a future of stability and cooperation in the region.
